In Chrappa v. Ohm,  O.J. No. 1663 (C.J.) at para. 27, Lax J. stated: “it is my view that, in general, the evidence of a family physician who has followed a patient over a long period of time can often be the most helpful evidence in sorting out the predictably differing views of medical experts who are assembled for the purposes of litigation.”
Treating doctors are not immune from reliability challenges. In Greer v. Horton,  O.J. No. 4826 (S.C.) at paras. 21-22, Epstein J. gave “little weight” to the treating doctor on the basis that his evidence “lacked objectivity.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.