In Kemp v. Wittenberg, [1999] B.C.J. No. 810 (S.C.) (Q.L.) Ralph J. commented on the underlying rationale of the discretion to re-open the case. He stated (at para. 5): At its heart the discretion has as its purpose the correction of what would otherwise be a miscarriage of justice. It is not, on my understanding of the cases, intended to be an alternative method of appeal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.