What is the test for ambiguity in the meaning of the word “interpretation”?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation 626 v. Bloor/Avenue Road Investment Inc., 2009 CanLII 44718 (ON SC):
The courts have dealt with what is meant by ambiguity in these circumstances. An ambiguity must be “real”. The words must be reasonably capable of more than one meaning. It is only when genuine ambiguity arises between two or more plausible readings, each equally in accordance with the intentions of the statute, that the courts need to resort to external interpretive aids (see: Bell ExpressVu v. Rex, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 550 at 581).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court interpreted section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines and interpreted the meaning of the word "intentionally" in relation to child support? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of words in legislation? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between the meaning of a tender and the interpretation of the tender? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the ambiguous "fixed term" contract? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for interpretation of a contract where the parties have a different interpretation of the facts? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the appropriate means exception in the Limitations Act? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of uninsured motorist coverage legislation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any interpretative problem with the meaning of the word "sexual immorality"? (Ontario, Canada)
If an insurance policy question is ambiguous and open to multiple interpretations and leads an applicant for insurance coverage to provide incorrect information, must the answer be resolved as against the insurer? (Ontario, Canada)
