24 In McCombe v. Kerfoot Datsun, unreported, 9 April 1986, Vancouver No. A842025 (referred to supra), Drost C.C.J. (as he then was) examined in detail the authorities which stand for the proposition that strict compliance with the appeal provisions of the Act is necessary to vest jurisdiction with the court. The discussion arose in the context of a motion to strike the appeal notice in circumstances where the judge had provisionally determined that the respondent was estopped from relying on the appellant's failure to comply with the limitation period for filing security with the court. After examining the authorities, the judge reached the contrary conclusion and therefore granted the motion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.