Is a pattern of allegations sufficient to prove a finding?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Dilico Anishinabek Family Care v. E.J., 2019 ONCJ 916 (CanLII):
However, in Kenora-Patricia Child and Family Services v. L(N) 2005 ONCJ 247, the court found that a pattern of allegations is not sufficient to prove a finding, if the underlying facts of the allegations are not proven.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When will the court make a finding of fact or finding of not finding fact in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Does Hoy J. Hoy J’s finding that the conspiracy pleading was sufficient to be considered sufficient? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for findings of fact in a motion to appeal against a finding of unlawful imprisonment? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an appellate court substitute a trial judge’s findings of fact or mixed findings of law with its own? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for overturning a finding of fact or finding of law? (Ontario, Canada)
Is uncertainty in an order sufficient to prevent prosecution of a contempt allegation? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between allegations of reprisal and allegations of mistreating? (Ontario, Canada)
Does there have to be a "substantial nexus" between the alleged negligence of an appellant in a medical malpractice case and the alleged loss of a patient? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a finding of fact made on an interlocutory finding in a separate judicial proceeding engage in issue estoppel in a subsequent proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for adding a new allegation to an application to add to the list of allegations against the respondent? (Ontario, Canada)
