Similarly, over one hundred years ago in Vidal v. Temperley (1899), 20 N.S.W.R. 223, Cohen J. observed at p. 227 that: ...dealing with the affairs of human life practically, and with our knowledge of human nature, we should not be astonished, where in an action of defamation a plaintiff abstains from going into the witness-box, so that the jury may judge, by his own testimony, of his reputation and how far, if at all, it has been injured by the alleged defamation that the jury, without weighing over nicely the question of libel of no libel, should determine not to give any damages for the alleged injury to that reputation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.