The defendants’ counsel begins with the important principle that determining hypothetical past events, such as what a plaintiff would have earned but for their injuries, requires that the events in question be “real and substantial possibilities”, not “mere speculation”. Such possibilities must be weighed according to their likelihood, and the question is what the plaintiff “would have”, not “could have” earned: see the cases summarized in Partridge v. Buskop, 2019 BCSC 459 at paras. 172-174.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.