Where it is doubtful whether a condition be precedent or subsequent the court prima facie treats it as being subsequent, for there is a presumption in favour of early vesting. There is significant legal significance to whether a condition is precedent or subsequent. If the condition is subsequent, early vesting of the estate is considered the more important object to fulfill and any clause of abrogation will fail: See Sifton v. Sifton, 1938 CanLII 110 (UK JCPC), [1938] A.C. 656, 3 All E.R. 435, O.R. 529, 3 D.L.R. 577 (P.C.) at para. 29.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.