The following comments of Silverman J. in Ho v. Dosanjh 2010 BCSC 845 at para. 91 are apt: I reject the notion that ongoing treatment that would provide the plaintiff with periodic temporary relief, but little to no additional improvement, should be something for which compensation should be paid for the rest of the plaintiff’s life. As previously noted, this loss has been considered as an aspect of non-pecuniary damages.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.