When is a piece of sod that fell off a pick-up truck not cargo but debris?

Yukon, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Skookum, 2019 YKSC 8 (CanLII):

The appellant also relies on the decision of Michel v. John Doe, 2008 BCSC 40, to submit that the piece of sod that fell off the pick-up truck was not cargo but debris. In that decision, the presiding judge found that a rock constituted “debris foreign to the cargo of logs”. The court acknowledged that the regulation at stake in that case imposed a high standard with regard to containment on cargo. However, the judge was not persuaded that the regulation went as far as requiring containment “that would completely prevent dislodgement of contamination of a load by debris such as rocks, soil, ice, snow or mud that may have been inadvertently trapped in the log cargo during the loading process”.

Other Questions


Does a Minister have a duty to maintain a highway? (Yukon, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the concept of conspiracy in a claim of wrongful dismissal? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for a finding of private nuisance against the Attorney General of Canada? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for an application to challenge for cause? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for having access to a parent who has a history of domestic violence? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for re-negotiating a settlement? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for a charge of careless use of a firearm? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the case law on admitting new evidence in a criminal appeal? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the factors that a trial judge should consider when deciding on the question of admissibility? (Yukon, Canada)
Is there a defence that has not been shown or not? (Yukon, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.