The case did not involve multiple issues, claims or parties, nor the assessment of complex technical or scientific evidence or competing scientific theories, nor competing expert evidence. While there was a lack of judicial authority that in itself does not mean a matter is of more than ordinary difficulty. A novel claim does not necessarily indicate complexity beyond ordinary difficulty (Stewart v. Lloyd’s Underwriters, 2020 BCSC 669 at para. 64.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.