The Board, following the approach laid out in Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General) 1 S.C.R. 342 at paras.16 and 17, stated in Applicants v. Jewish Family and Child Services of Toronto, 2011 CFSRB 16, para 51: In order for a matter to be moot, it is necessary to first determine if the “required tangible and concrete dispute has disappeared and the issues have become academic’. If there is still a “live controversy” the issue is not moot and there is no need to enquire further.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.