What is the test for challenging an award for damages awarded by a jury in a personal injury case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Morlan v. Barrett, 2012 BCCA 66 (CanLII):

As already mentioned, a trial judge’s assessment of damages is entitled to considerable deference. The approach to be taken when an award is challenged on the basis that it is inordinately high or inordinately low was discussed by Mr. Justice K. Smith in Marois v. Pelech, 2009 BCCA 286, 95 B.C.L.R. (4th) 243:

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for challenging an award in a personal injury case where damages are awarded on the basis that it is inordinately high or inordinately low? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining the quantum of damages awarded by a judge in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors should be considered in determining the amount of damages awarded by the Court in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the most common types of aggravated damages awarded in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles governing an award of non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.