What is considered nuisance in a strata setting?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from McKenna et al v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 495, 2019 BCCRT 1024 (CanLII):
52. Nuisance in a strata setting has been found to be an unreasonable continuing or repeated interference with a person’s enjoyment and use of their strata lot. (See The Owners, Strata Plan LMS 3539 v. Ng, 2016 BCSC 2462).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does nuisance constitute nuisance in a strata setting? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a strata corporation's delay in informing its owners of a lawsuit against the strata is in breach of section 167(1) of the BC Strata Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a 3/4 vote of the Owner of a strata bylaw 16.1 violate the Owner's expectation that strata council positions will not be allotted by strata lot type? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a majority of owners of a residential strata have voted to replace a carpet under their strata, can they force the strata to do so? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an owner of a strata without the strata's approval to install a hot water heater without the approval of the Strata? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a section of Strata Plan charge back costs incurred by an individual strata for damage caused to a strata lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the tort of nuisance in a strata setting? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a strata corporation liable to reimburse an owner for expenses incurred in carrying out repairs to the owner's strata lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a strata liable to reimburse an owner for expenses incurred to repair the interior of the strata lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
