Significant unfairness must be compelling or meaningful having regard to the factors set out in s. 95(2) and reapportionment will require something objectively unjust, unreasonable or unfair in some important or substantial sense: Jaszczewska v. Kostanski, 2016 BCCA 286 at paras, 38, 41 and 42.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.