Is the Crown required to call evidence on the voir dire first?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Colegrove, 2000 BCPC 115 (CanLII):
Defense counsel all disagreed with this interpretation of Regina v. Feldman. They argued that the crown was required to call evidence first on the voir dire.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the impact of an injunction being sought against a First Nations First Nation (formerly First Nations) band for access to their traditional lands? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the procedure used by First Nations First Nations to obtain access to First Nations land? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for renouncing the evidence required to prove the purpose of the contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What evidence is required to prove the purpose of the legislation is to infringe aboriginal rights? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does common sense apply to determine whether care is required even in the absence of medical evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Section 15(5) of the BC Civil Code require a person not to commence, prosecute or defend a proceeding in any court, even without evidence of a fee, gain or reward? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
How much evidence will be required by a plaintiff to prove their case on the issue of causation? (British Columbia, Canada)
