In context of the priority of statutory principles, R.L v. Children’ s Aid Society of Niagara Region specifically stipulates that permanency planning must give way to the principles enunciated in subsections 1(2) and 57(3) and (4) before a finding is made. And to those who will argue that a child could languish in a temporary foster placement for a very long time before a risk hearing is held, the legislature addressed this factor when it established the 120-day timeline for such hearing.
 In my mind, the direction in paragraph  of R.L v. Children’ s Aid Society of Niagara Region supports a short-term placement in every case where an apprehension occurs. I am aware of the opinion among attachment experts that the more a child is moved, the harder it will be for him or her to establish a healthy attachment but societies have to accept that the statute may give them no choice.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.