What is the relevant portion of the fee agreement in a family law case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Jackson v. Stephen Durbin and Associates, 2017 ONSC 5396 (CanLII):
Pakka v. Nygard was the only family law case relied upon by the respondent. In that case the relevant portion of the fee agreement read as follows: I understand and agree that in addition to the fees charged in interim accounts, there will be a final account at which the complexity of the issues and the result obtained may also be taken into consideration in filing the amount of the final fee.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the implications of a family law case law review of the applicable provisions and case law principles for costs in family law? (Ontario, Canada)
When a motion judge approved the sale agreement and technology license agreement and approval of the sale and sale agreement, what analysis applied? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the parties’ agreement on the division of net family property pursuant to the terms of the agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that states that parties are not aware of the effect of the case on the other side? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on surreptitious recording of telephone conversations in a family law case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a formal offer made by a plaintiff in a family law case not in compliance with r. 18 of the Family Law Rules? (Ontario, Canada)
What relevance does relevance exist in the context of relevance? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the relevant case law for giving evidence from a third party witness in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What are some of the most relevant and relevant cases in the history of personal injury law? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a judge should consider some of the issues before the trial of the others? (Ontario, Canada)
