What is the patent unreasonableness standard in the interpretation of a collective agreement?

Saskatchewan, Canada

The following excerpt is from Canada Safeway Ltd. v. Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 454, 2004 SKQB 102 (CanLII):

A board of arbitration decision should be reviewed on the patent unreasonableness standard to the extent it relates specifically to the interpretation of the terms of a collective agreement: Toronto(City) Board of Education v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, District 15, 1997 CanLII 378 (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 487 at 507:

Other Questions

Does a collective agreement have to be interpreted as binding or binding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the standard conditions in an agreement between two parties? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How do courts determine whether a matter arises out of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a compromise agreement in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a collective bargaining agreement includes freedom of speech or freedom of expression? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is evidence of an oral agreement not admissible to alter the terms of a written agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a parol agreement where a landlord was induced to sign a lease with a promise that rabbits would be destroyed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have words like “my surviving children” been interpreted in a will and how have they been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a claim for breach of a collective agreement be brought in superior court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.