How have courts interpreted notice of a deed?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Friesen v. Saskatchewan Mortgage & Trust Corporation Ltd., 1924 CanLII 135 (SK CA):

And in Shaw v. Foster (1872) L.R. 5 H.L. 321, 42 L.J. Ch. 49, at p. 65, Lord O’Hagan said: No doubt notice of a deed is notice of all that the deed contains and notice of one instrument which leads on reasonably to the knowledge of other instruments, and these to others, may be taken to be notice of the contents of all.

Other Questions


How have the words "gift" and "garnishment" in clause 3 of the Statement of Claimant's Notice of Claim to the Court of Appeal been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted notice of a vendor’s lien? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is a reasonable excuse can be established in a notice notice application if someone is temporarily incapable of attending to his affairs or giving instructions during the notice period? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the expression “null and void” in the context of null and void? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of words in a libel case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a notice of notice necessary in circumstances where a plaintiff is seeking to sue for damages of more than £200,000? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a plea of non est factum? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted answers to the jury in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a surrender statement in the context of a commercial lease? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.