Is a personal representative entitled to exercise his discretion?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hoffman Estate (Re), 2019 ABQB 473 (CanLII):

Nor is it controversial that the courts should be reluctant to interfere with a personal representative’s exercise of discretion, and should do so only if there is evidence the personal representative acted in bad faith, is guilty of obvious misconduct, was not authorized to act in the manner he did under the will, or took into account irrelevant considerations: McNeil v. McNeil, 2006 ABQB 636, 408 AR 144, at para 84.

Other Questions


What is the test for an unmarried person to be entitled to the same status as a married person? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a person who is unable to appreciate the risk associated with certain activities entitled to be treated differently than a person with the capacity to understand the risk? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for exercising discretion in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied to the exercise of discretion in custody? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the liability of the estate, the personal representative and the surviving spouse for funeral expenses? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a person who is injured in an accident is entitled to compensation? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the definition of a personal injury policy in the context of personal injury claims? (Alberta, Canada)
Does an agent have to be personally liable on a contract where the principal of the contract is not personally liable? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an individual to obtain from another person who has contributed to another person's income? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for retaining title to a property in the name of a person who has transferred it into another person's name gratuitously? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.