Again, a similar conclusion was reached by Madam Justice Chappel in Damaschin-Zamfirescu v. Damaschin-Zamfirescu, 2012 ONSC 6689. The court concisely outlined some of the policy reasons behind the court’s power to vary interim support orders as derived from the court’s inherent jurisdiction to amend interlocutory orders. At paras. 18-20, she wrote:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.