Does a party who is seeking damages for unjust enrichment have to prove that its conduct was untainted?

Ontario, Canada

The following excerpt is from Smith v. National Money Mart Company, 2007 CanLII 186 (ON SC):

MacPherson J., as he then was, noted at p. 373 of Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Bank of Montreal that because unjust enrichment is an equitable remedy, the party claiming it must establish that its conduct leading to its deprivation was untainted.

Other Questions

What is the test of unjust enrichment in the context of a claim for unjust enrichment? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it possible for a party seeking to impute income to get to the first step, laying the evidentiary foundation, where the party against whom they are seeking to be imputed makes little or no financial disclosure to the court? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the onus on a party seeking to conduct an examination pursuant to Rule 39.03(1)? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court allow a plaintiff to seek damages for undifferentiated damages? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test to prove unjust enrichment against another person? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the factors that apply when a party seeks to plead to a finding that a party has not followed the 5 factors in its pleading? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove a breach of fiduciary duty to a third party to recover damages? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment apply when there is a contact binding on the parties to the collective agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party bring an issue of issue estoppel against the party seeking to relitigate the matter? (Ontario, Canada)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.