California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hargiss v. Royal Air Properties, Inc., 206 Cal.App.2d 414, 23 Cal.Rptr. 683 (Cal. App. 1962):
Defendant contends first that indulging in all inferences in plaintiff's favor, there is no substantial evidence to support the allegations of plaintiff's complaint. This, of course, recognizes the same rule set forth in Devens v. Goldberg, 33 Cal.2d 173, 177(4), 199 P.2d 943.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.