I should mention that this is not, for me, a case where the learned trial judge found there was no evidence of intent to defraud or intent to defraud. The learned trial judge, in her judgment, makes reference to the possibility of “a more fraudulent intent” leaving it clear that she saw a fraudulent intent. She makes reference to a young woman in a like case whose evidence she believed and went on to contrast her with the appellant. See Rex v. McKee, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.