California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Salatino v. Olivenhain Mun. Water Dist., D071256 (Cal. App. 2018):
seems to be claiming the City or County's acceptance of dedication of roads in the vicinity was valid, even if implied, and cannot now be altered. (See Sacramento County v. Lauszus (1945) 70 Cal.App.2d 639, 645, 651 [land held for public purposes is not subject to the operation of the statute of limitations].) He does not show how his arguments properly promote public, not private, benefit in this respect.