Is Defendant entitled to a supplemental brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks the court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Palmer, C067195, Super. Ct. No. 09F6152 (Cal. App. 2011):

Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.

Other Questions


On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion of appeal against a judgment that found that defendant failed to provide a supplemental brief to the Court on appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion of appeal against a judgment that found that a defendant has failed to file a supplemental brief to the Court on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test required by the Court to review the record and determine if there are any arguable issues on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is Defendant's appointed counsel permitted a supplemental brief in which he asked this court to conduct an independent review of the record pursuant to People v Wende? (California, United States of America)
What evidence does the Ontario Court of Appeal need to consider to determine whether a widow entitled to a pension is entitled to receive the pension from her dependent? (California, United States of America)
Is Defendant's court-appointed counsel required to file supplemental briefing to review the record under People v. Wende? (California, United States of America)
Does a quasi-judicial review of the evidence presented to the trial court to determine whether any triable issues of fact were presented? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court order an independent review of the record in determining whether a defendant has a right to exercise his privacy? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.