Is an order fixing fee awarded to a receiver reasonable?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from W & W Properties of Orange County LLC v. Heritage Gardens Properties Inc., G043949, Super. Ct. No. 07CC05906 (Cal. App. 2011):
"The amount of fees awarded to a receiver is 'in the sound discretion of the trial court and in the absence of a clear showing of an abuse of discretion, a reviewing court is not justified in setting aside an order fixing fees.'" (Melikian v. Aquila, Ltd. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1364, 1368.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing that rates fixed by a lawful rate-fixing body are reasonable, fair and lawful? (California, United States of America)
When a fee order under review is ordered by a judge other than the trial judge, does the court have any discretion or authority to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making a reasonable grounds for arrest within a police department by one officer transmitting information purportedly received from an informer to another officer who had not received such information? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a judge order a motion to set aside a previous order in the administration of the same estate after the same order has become final? (California, United States of America)
If a restraining order is renewed automatically, is the mere issuance of the original restraining order sufficient to trigger the renewal of the restraining order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
When a judgment of divorce is not self-executing in respect of any division of property ordered, does the court have jurisdiction to make further orders to compel obedience to the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making findings of fact and conclusions of law in relation to an order that denied modification of an order fixing inheritance tax? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award, what is the standard for reviewing an order from the trial court? (California, United States of America)
