Is a judgment not an adjudication as to matters which the court expressly refrains from determining?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lockwood v. Cal. Horse Racing Bd., B291002 (Cal. App. 2019):
Lockwood also relies on Stark v. Coker (1942) 20 Cal.2d 839, 843 for the proposition that "[a] judgment is not an adjudication as to matters which the court expressly refrains from determining." That principle has no application here, where
Page 14
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have authority to determine whether a judgment creditor agreed to accept less than the face value of the judgment? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How does the clerk of the court remit to the trial court a copy of the judgment or order of the reviewing court? (California, United States of America)
When there is a discrepancy between the abstract of judgment and the trial court's oral pronouncement of judgment, does the court have to rely on the reporter's transcript? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court review a determination of the entitlement to fees in a judgment even if there is no postjudgment order determining the amount of fees? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
