California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Miranda v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 111 Cal.Rptr. 419, 36 Cal.App.3d 213 (Cal. App. 1973):
Petitioner here contends that because the interviewer initially determined that he was eligible, the benefit payments became due and that the Director was powerless to change that decision upon review by the supervisor without a 'due process' hearing. In taking this position petitioner relies on California Dept. of Human Resources v. Java, 402 U.S. 121, 91 S.Ct. 1347, 28 L.Ed.2d 666 and Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287. We disagree.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.