California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Mitchell v. Superior Court of Fresno County, 152 Cal.App.3d 1212, 200 Cal.Rptr. 57 (Cal. App. 1984):
The information sought by deposition questions 1 through 4 is relevant to the genuineness of petitioner's claim for emotional distress (Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1980) 27 Cal.3d 916, 167 Cal.Rptr. 831, 616 P.2d 813), and is therefore an appropriate matter for discovery by the real parties in interest.
D. DOES THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE PROTECT FACTUAL INFORMATION TRANSMITTED BY ATTORNEY TO CLIENT?
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.