In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the standard used by the courts to determine whether to grant an enhancement?

In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, " ' "we review the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses substantial evidencethat is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid valuefrom which a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." ' " (People v. Wilson (2008) 44 Cal.4th 758, 806.) " 'We review the sufficiency of the evidence to support an enhancement using the same standard we apply to a conviction. [Citation.] Thus, we presume every fact in support of the judgment the trier of fact could have reasonably deduced from the evidence.' " (Ibid.)