What is the standard of review for errors attributed to a trial judge?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mollins v. R., 2011 NBCA 62 (CanLII):

Except for ground 5, the errors attributed to the trial judge can be characterized as questions of fact (the factual findings made by a judge or the inferences drawn by a judge from the facts), or as questions of mixed fact and law (the application of a legal standard to a particular set of facts). Leave to appeal is therefore required for grounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7: pursuant to s. 675(1)(a)(ii) of the Criminal Code. The applicable standard of review for these grounds is that of palpable and overriding error (see Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235).

Other Questions


What is the test for appeal against a finding that a judge committed a “palpable and overriding error” on the basis of error? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the impact of expert opinion on a trial judge's gatekeeping role? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an arbitrator's decision? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review on findings of fact? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is interference justified on the basis that the trial judge misapprehended the evidence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of correctness of a motion judge’s decision not to interfere with a discretionary order? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the purpose of determining the correctness of a motion? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does a motion judge commit any reversible error in her application of the Divorce Act? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of conduct of an attesting officer in giving evidence at a criminal trial? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does a judge make a palpable and overriding error of fact when exercising costs in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.