What is the test for a jury to overturn a finding that a jury misapprehended or misunderstood the evidence?

Saskatchewan, Canada

The following excerpt is from Jackson v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co., 1915 CanLII 123 (SK QB):

This court held in Fraser v. Drew, 1900 CanLII 82 (SCC), 30 S.C.R. 241, that where a case has been properly submitted to a jury and their findings upon the facts are such as might be the conclusions of reasonable men, a new trial will not be granted on the ground that the jury misapprehended or misunderstood the evidence, notwithstanding that the trial judge was dissatisfied with the verdict.

Other Questions

Can a finding of fact be reversed if the finding was based on a palpable and overriding error? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can evidence of a chemical analysis of a sample taken after the 2-hour period be used in evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What evidence supports a finding that the accused was in care or control and both while impaired? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of using economic and actuarial evidence on an award for head of damage in a motor vehicle accident? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the consequences of a trial judge’s failure to spell out every consideration leading to a finding of credibility? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the jury been instructed in a sexual assault trial to consider corroboration evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a Traffic Safety Court Justice of the Peace (JPS) have any authority or authority to reject or reject the evidence presented by the defence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can the demeanour and emotional state of the complainant be considered as corroborative evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is evidence of a subsequent declaration of intent admissible to enhance damages? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any evidence that a judgment of last December has been perfected? (Saskatchewan, Canada)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.