What is the test for adduce evidence in an extradition hearing?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from United States of America v. Trotter, 2013 BCSC 1764 (CanLII):

According to United States of America v. Ferras, 2006 SCC 33 at para. 53, under s. 32(1)(c), a person sought may adduce evidence if it is relevant to the issue of committal - i.e., whether the ROC is sufficient and reliable enough to justify extradition. And the evidence may be admitted if it meets the standard of threshold reliability (i.e., it possesses sufficient indicia of reliability to make it worth of judicial consideration) even if it would not normally meet Canadian evidentiary rules.

Other Questions


What summary of evidence is admissible as evidence in an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for adduce evidence in an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on hearsay summary evidence at an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting or denying evidence in an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is "fresh evidence" that was adduced at the hearing of the judgment in question? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it appropriate to re-open a hearing to receive oral evidence in cases of conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is defence evidence that strikes directly at the reliability of the requesting state’s materials admissible at the extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a refusal of an extradition judge to hear evidence for the purposes of creating a record not a reviewable matter? (British Columbia, Canada)
What jurisdiction does an extradition judge have at a committal hearing under the Extradition Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant evidence to be adduced at a committal hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.