How have the courts considered findings of fact in the context of an evidentiary hearing?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cook v. Coquitlam Towing & Storage, 2013 BCHRT 267 (CanLII):
Although I say, at the outset, that I do not make findings of fact in the context of this decision, I must, and have, assessed the materials filed by the parties to come to an opinion about the likelihood that findings of fact could be made, after a full evidentiary hearing, to support the complaint: Evans v. University of British Columbia, 2008 BCSC 1026.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts considered the meaning of s. 35(4)(b)(b) of the BC Code of Civil Procedure in the context of a modification of restrictive covenants? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for malicious intent in the context of an appeal against the findings of a finding of malicious intent? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court consider 4 costs considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts in BC considered undue influence in the context of a will where the testator engaged in activities with his family members as a child? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered by the Court of Appeal for an appeal against the findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Court considered a step-daughter's expectation of inheritance in the context of the equitable obligation of her father to her step-step-distant? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has consent or court approval been considered in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the evidentiary presumptions in the context of an allegation of intent to pervert the course of justice? (British Columbia, Canada)
