California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center Associates, 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 301, 235 Cal.App.3d 1220 (Cal. App. 1991):
Although the trial court's denial of a motion for new trial should be given deference, an appellate court has the responsibility to intervene when the verdict is so palpably excessive to raise the presumption of passion and prejudice. (Dumas v. Stocker (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1262, 1266, 262 Cal.Rptr. 311. Appellate courts must scrutinize punitive damage verdicts because they "constitute a windfall, create the anomaly of excessive compensation, and are therefore not favored in the law. [Citation.]" (Ibid., fn. omitted.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.