In a summary conviction appeal court, is a failure to comply with the observation period considered evidence of an operational deficiency?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Vetsch, 2013 ABPC 194 (CanLII):

In R v. Dezman, [1977] AJ No. 689 (Dist. Ct.), the summary conviction appeal court determined that non‑compliance with the observation period, in and of itself, does not constitute evidence to the contrary. The court's reasoning is largely based on the need to connect the operational deficiency with an inaccurate breath reading.

Other Questions


Can a waiver be signed to allow a summary conviction court to transfer information between two summary conviction courts? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a rehearing of a claim be reviewed by the Court of Appeal if the rehearing board used considered "new" evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the relevant case law on summary conviction and summary conviction? (Alberta, Canada)
What authority does the Court of Appeal have in common with the Courts of Appeal in England and Wales? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for appeal leave to appeal the decision of a development appeal board? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the impact of a decision by the Court of Appeal to re-open an application for fresh evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors must the reviewing court consider in determining whether a decision is final or subject to appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.