What is the test for admissibility of a plaintiff’s counseling records?

British Columbia, Canada

The following excerpt is from Desharnais v. Parkhurst and Romanowski, 2013 BCCA 113 (CanLII):

The plaintiff’s trial counsel objected to the admissibility of the counseling records as hearsay. The trial judge found that the counseling records fit within the traditional exception for medical records to the rule against hearsay as stated in Ares v. Venner, 1970 CanLII 5 (SCC), [1970] S.C.R. 608.

Other Questions

Can a counsel of record be removed from the record because of a conflict of interest? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can statements made to doctors as recorded in clinical records qualify as business records? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff’s medical records have been produced to support the argument that the evidentiary record is insufficient? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for balancing of prejudice between a plaintiff and his defence counsel? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a need for physical or temporal proximity between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
When counsel withdraws from a motion, does the trial judge need to question counsel as to their reasons? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Are clinical records admissible in a personal injury claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for bringing an application for an extension of the term of time for a class of plaintiffs with three separate law firms and four named counsel working for them? (British Columbia, Canada)

Alexi white

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.