California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Philpot, D071726 (Cal. App. 2018):
People v. Trujillo (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1344 (Trujillo) is particularly on point with respect to whether the evidence in this case is sufficient to support a conviction for assault with a firearm against R.R. In Trujillo, a defendant shot into a moving vehicle with tinted windows that was occupied by not only the driver, but by a backseat passenger, as well. This court rejected a claim that a defendant who fires into a vehicle knowing only that it is occupied by one person cannot be guilty of assault with a firearm against a passenger who the defendant may not have been aware was also in the vehicle. (Trujillo, supra, at pp. 1354-1357.) The jury convicted the defendant of two counts of assault with a firearm, despite the fact that there was no evidence that the defendant was actually aware that someone other than the driver was also in the vehicle. (Id. at p.
Page 23
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.