Can a defendant argue that the court intended to impose the minimum fine permitted by law?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gonzalez, G048107 (Cal. App. 2014):
As defendant cites us to nothing in the record to support his implied contention the court intended to impose the minimum fine permitted by law, we deem this argument waived. (Schubert v. Reynolds (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 100, 109.)
The judgment is affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a defendant be able to argue that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about two prior convictions subject to the conditions the court imposed? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that a lower court found for plaintiff because the court disbelieved defendant's evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a defendant has argued that a sentence imposed by a court was wrong when it imposed a prison term on a convicted rapist? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that the court erred in permitting the jury to hear evidence of uncharged misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a court's failure to impose a minimum sentence on a defendant's conviction for theft and receipt? (California, United States of America)
In arguing that the trial court abused its power to deny a motion to sever an indecent exposure charge from a sexual assault charge, does defendant rely on Earle v Earle to argue that the motion was abused? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have authority to argue that the trial court intended to impose a consecutive sentence on count 11? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a court finding that a motion brought by Attorney Defendants against Defendant Kendall was "frivolous and/or intended to harass"? (California, United States of America)
