Does the confrontation principle apply to cross-examination of a witness for a party opposed in interest?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R v Singh, 2015 ONSC 6823 (CanLII):

In R. v. Quansah,[21] Watt J.A. reviews the rule in Browne v. Dunn and concludes that it “reflects a confrontation principle in the context of cross-examination of a witness for a party opposed in interest on disputed factual issues”.

Other Questions


What is the confrontation principle in cross-examination of a witness for a party opposed in interest? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the "cont confrontation principle" in the context of cross-examination of a witness for a party opposed in interest? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party who brings the motion as well as the witnesses upon whom the moving/applying party relies have an obligation to present and present witnesses to the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the principle of corporate separateness override the equitable principles of equitable principles in the context of vicarious liability? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the mootness principle apply to interveners in a matter of public interest? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a comment made by a party to a party’s communications entitled to be impugned as a matter of public interest? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the requirement of uberrima fides apply when the parties have entered into a separation agreement requiring the parties to pay support for the children of the marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a party’s email to the opposing party of a parenting motion for custody of the children? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the factors that apply when a party seeks to plead to a finding that a party has not followed the 5 factors in its pleading? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a crown attorney acting for the applicant in a litigation between parties not providing a service to the opposing party? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.