In what circumstances will a motorcyclist be held liable for injuries sustained in a collision with a car at a busy intersection?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Dubitski v. Barbieri, 2004 ABQB 187 (CanLII):

In Bond v. Mingo, supra the plaintiff’s motorcycle collided with the defendant’s car. The defendant had stopped to make a left hand turn and was waiting for a vehicle to complete a right turn before completing the left turn when the plaintiff struck defendant's vehicle from the opposite direction. O’Leary J. held the plaintiff and defendant equally negligent, finding that the excessive rate of speed contributed to the plaintiff's injuries. O’Leary J. found that the plaintiff must have known that visibility of left turners at the intersection was poor, and had he been travelling at a reasonable rate of speed in the circumstances he would have been able to stop or otherwise avoid the collision by turning.

In Wittmeier v. Scholes, supra the plaintiff hit the defendant, who was attempting a left turn. The road was slippery and the defendant attempted to clear the intersection when he saw the plaintiff’s vehicle but was unable to get any traction. The defendant submitted that the plaintiff was inattentive and was travelling too fast given the road conditions. Perras J. apportioned liability 64 per cent to the defendant and 36 per cent to the plaintiff, finding that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent because his attention was distracted, and his speed was excessive given the road conditions.

Heller v. Martens, supra was a case where the plaintiff was injured when the defendant ran a stop sign and hit him. The only issue at trial was whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent for failing to wear a seatbelt. The majority on appeal, after considering the proper approach to apportionment, held that the plaintiff bore no burden to prove that he would have suffered injury had he worn a seatbelt. The majority dismissed the defendant’s appeal, finding that the trial judge properly concluded that both the failure to stop at the stop sign (75% liability) and the failure to wear a seatbelt (25% liability) materially contributed to the injuries. Analysis Speed

Other Questions


In what circumstances will an independent contractor be held liable in a personal injury action for changing a piece of plywood in the middle panel? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be liable for failing to reduce his or her vehicle’s speed as a result of the collision? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to be held liable for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a plaintiff not be liable for failing to warn the driver of the vehicle that there is no evidence that such warnings would have prevented the accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Does an agent have to be personally liable on a contract where the principal of the contract is not personally liable? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will an employer be held vicariously liable for an employee’s unauthorized, intentional wrongs? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court grant summary judgment in a personal injury action? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a manufacturer liable for injuries caused by their product? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for any injuries caused or contributed to by their negligence? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be required to repay in full to a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.