The appellants further argue that the motion judge misapprehended the facts when he found that there had already been a calculation of damages. The respondent agrees that the motion judge erred in implying that damages had been calculated. The appellants submit that the issue of detrimental reliance is a fact specific assessment of all of the advantages and disadvantages yielded by the decision which would require individual discoveries: Ault v. Canada, at paras. 115-119.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.