In addition, APR #2 cannot be considered to have been filed in a timely manner because it appears that it was defective when filed. At the very least, contrary to Shase v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 FC 418, cited by the applicant, it is speculation to argue that a decision could be made shortly, given the failure of the applicant and his spouse to file a valid sponsorship application.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.