It is, however, argued by learned counsel for the appellant that the decisions have crystallized the law so as to be applicable to all annuities, irrespective of the ratio decidendi. With this submission I cannot agree. “ * * * every judgment must be read as applicable to the particular facts proved or assumed to be proved, since the generality of the expressions which may be found there are not intended to be expositions of the whole law, but are governed and qualified by the particular facts of the case in which such expressions are used:” Quinn v. Leathern [1901] A.C. 495, 70 L.J.P.C. 76, at 81.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.