What is the test for a variation of a decision in a personal injury case?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Oh v. Usher, 2013 BCCA 104 (CanLII):
On an application to vary it must be shown that the judge was wrong in law, or wrong in principle, or misconceived the facts: Haldorson v. Coquitlam (City), 2000 BCCA 672, at para. 7.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the BCSC provide advice to the parties on organization and preparation of the personal injury trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a claim for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In making a determinate order on a motion of no confidence in a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case, what are the reasons why such a determination is necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Canada consider a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a decision by summary trial in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
