Thus, the party moving to vary a prior interim order as to custody or access must establish: 1. There has been a change in circumstances affecting the best interests of the child since the making of the prior order; and, 2. The best interests of the child require a change in the status quo having regard to the circumstances of the child including the factors in s. 24(2) of the CLRA: Ceho v. Ceho, supra, at paras. 90-91, 93 and 94. Put another way, there are compelling reasons that the order should be varied to meet the child’s best interests: Greve v. Brighton, supra, para. 24.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.