Is mitigation a consideration for each head of damage in a motor vehicle accident?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Mullens v. Toor, 2016 BCSC 1645 (CanLII):
It is appropriate to consider the issue of mitigation separately in respect of each head of damage: Zawadzki v. Calimoso 2011 BCSC 45, at para. 164.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motor vehicle accident involving a stolen vehicle, can the driver of the stolen vehicle be held liable for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the existence of the ICBC and its role in defending damages for damages flowing from motor vehicle accidents take into account? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing damages for non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent motor vehicle collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of damages for non-pecuniary damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for awarding punitive damages in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to be awarded head of damages in her motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
