What is the threshold for variation under the Spousal Support Act?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Wedsworth v. Wedsworth, 2001 NSCA 102 (CanLII):

In my respectful view, the correct threshold for this variation application is that set out in s. 17(4.1) of the Act which requires the party seeking variation to establish that “... a change in the condition, means, needs or other circumstances of either former spouse has occurred since the making of the spousal support order...”. A change will be sufficient within the meaning of this section if it is one that, if the court had known about it at the time of the original order, the order made would likely have had different terms: Willick v. Willick, 1994 CanLII 28 (SCC), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 670 at 688.

Other Questions


Does a delay in seeking spousal support, even if it is an extensive delay, negate the jurisdiction of the court to award support? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the range of retroactive variation in the amount of child and spousal support awarded by the Court of Appeal? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the mere passage of time or the normal process of aging constitute a material change in circumstances for a variation of a spousal support order? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How to determine entitlement to spousal support in a childless marriage? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the legal foundation for spousal support? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How is spousal support awarded to a woman who stays home to raise a child? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for spousal support for a disabled spouse who has custody of her disabled husband? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances will child support be considered as income for purposes of child support purposes? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the threshold requirement of material change for variation of an order for access to a child? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is retroactive spousal support appropriate? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.